20211105
14304700
1.0
FALSE
B5_COMBINED_VOTES_rev5
002
23.301697
30.160278
-34.063110
-30.057190
1
Geographic
GCS_Hartebeesthoek_1994
Angular Unit: Degree (0.017453)
<GeographicCoordinateSystem xsi:type='typens:GeographicCoordinateSystem' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:typens='http://www.esri.com/schemas/ArcGIS/10.8'><WKT>GEOGCS["GCS_Hartebeesthoek_1994",DATUM["D_Hartebeesthoek_1994",SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433],AUTHORITY["EPSG",4148]]</WKT><XOrigin>-450359962737.0495</XOrigin><YOrigin>-450359962737.0495</YOrigin><XYScale>10000</XYScale><ZOrigin>-100000</ZOrigin><ZScale>10000</ZScale><MOrigin>-100000</MOrigin><MScale>10000</MScale><XYTolerance>8.983152841195215e-09</XYTolerance><ZTolerance>0.001</ZTolerance><MTolerance>0.001</MTolerance><HighPrecision>true</HighPrecision><LeftLongitude>-180</LeftLongitude><WKID>4148</WKID><LatestWKID>4148</LatestWKID></GeographicCoordinateSystem>
20211025
11004300
20211025
11004300
150000000
5000
ISO19139
ISO 19139 Metadata Implementation Specification
Version 6.2 (Build 9200) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.8.1.14362
B5_COMBINED_VOTES_rev5
vector digital data
2021-10-25T00:00:00
2021-10-25T00:00:00
1
23.301697
30.160278
-30.057190
-34.063110
Spatial Location of B5 infrastructure and human settlement projects.
<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN>The Project information was sourced from National Treasury, Provincial Budget,2021 Estimate Provincial Revenue and Expenditure.</SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN>B5 schedule coordinates were used to geolocate the project. Further desktop verification was done by using the below methodology:</SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Project datasets were sourced from various formats. Primarily from PSDF plans for different Local municipalities or districts in the Eastern Cape.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>These datasets were digitised, cleaned and imported into geo-database format.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>From here the data was assessed in terms of accuracy of the spatial information supplied in the original project datasets. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Individual departmental datasets were cleaned in order to make the data schemas compatible.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>This allowed the data to be merged into one geo-database table.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>The spatial accuracy of the supplied information was assessed. The records with missing spatial coordinates were then assessed and a process of locating the correct spatial reference was undertaken.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>This process involved sourcing other spatial datasets such as human settlements, schools, health and existing projects etc.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>A join to whichever dataset was most logical was performed in order to populate the spatial fields.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>The resultant spatial locations of these projects cannot be guaranteed, therefore a field called "</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;"><SPAN>VERIFIED</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN><SPAN>" was created in order to indicate where possible, the data had been supplied in the original project datasets, or had been sourced and linked from other datasets. </SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="font-weight:bold;margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN>Field : Verified</SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;"><SPAN>Verified</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN><SPAN>: Either coordinates were supplied in the original project datasets or it was sourced from other datasets where matches could be found. As example - where schools had no coordinates in the original project datasets, EMIS schools datasets were linked and consulted in order to match the school names so the coordinates could be transferred.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;"><SPAN>Unverified</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN><SPAN>: No coordinates supplied with the original project datasets.</SPAN></SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Fish.A & Tucker.A.2021. B5 Projects for Eastern Cape Province. East London.South Africa
B5
Projects
2021
Provincial
Eastern Cape
<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The data has not been verified on the ground and was only captured using budget vote documents and other planning databases. No site visits were conducted.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
File Geodatabase Feature Class
dataset
EPSG
9.5.5(8.1.0)
1981
Simple
FALSE
1981
TRUE
FALSE
B5_COMBINED_VOTES_rev5
Feature Class
1981
OBJECTID_1
OBJECTID_1
OID
4
0
0
Internal feature number.
Esri
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
VOTE
VOTE
String
255
0
0
Department
Department
String
255
0
0
Infrastructure_Transfers
Infrastructure Transfers
String
255
0
0
Type_of_Infrastructure
Type of_Infrastructure
String
255
0
0
Project_Name
Project Name
String
255
0
0
IDMS_Gate
IDMS Gate
String
255
0
0
District_Municipality
District_Municipality
String
255
0
0
Date_start
Date_start
Date
8
0
0
Date_finish
Date_finish
Date
8
0
0
Source_of_Funding
Source of_Funding
String
255
0
0
Budget_program_name
Budget program_name
String
255
0
0
Lat_
Lat#
Double
8
0
0
Lon_
Lon#
Double
8
0
0
Total_Project_Cost
Total Project Cost
Double
8
0
0
Total_Expenditure_to_date_from_previous_years
Total Expenditure_to date from previous_years
Double
8
0
0
TotalAvailable_21_22
TotalAvailable_21_22
Double
8
0
0
MTEF_Forward_Estimates_22_23
MTEF Forward Estimates_22_23
Double
8
0
0
MTEF_Forward_Estimates_23_24
MTEF Forward Estimates_23_24
Double
8
0
0
Verified
Verified
String
50
0
0
Shape
Shape
Geometry
0
0
0
Feature geometry.
Esri
Coordinates defining the features.
20211025
Zanele Sihlahla
COGTA Eastern Cape
Chief GIS Professional